PICTURE
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from cambolah. Make your own badge here.
Join the People Over Profits Grassroots Network.
    CURRENT MOON
    moon info
      The WeatherPixie
        NaJuReMoNoMo
          Winner

          Sunday, October 18, 2009

          Vote YES on Proposal I on November 3


          What is the Regional Enhancement Millage?

          This millage is designed to help fund current operations for Ypsilanti Public Schools and the other nine public school districts in Washtenaw County. The funding generated from this millage will only be used for existing programs, not to add new ones. Without this support, the schools face serious staff and service reductions.

          Why a millage?

          We need good schools, and our schools are in trouble. State funding of schools has not kept pace with inflation for years and YPS has reduced expenditures annually. The current economic downturn threatens to decimate our public school districts.

          With the state’s unstable funding, Ypsilanti faces a six million dollar shortfall for the current school year and the 2010-11 school year looks even more bleak. Our neighboring districts face similar shortfalls.

          Why is this important?

          Investment in our children. Our children need the best preparation possible for the jobs of the future, no matter what they do after high school. The economy is changing, and our schools need the resources to get our kids ready.

          The money stays here. Every penny raised by this millage would stay in the county and go directly to teaching the children in the ten districts of the Washtenaw Intermediate School District: Ann Arbor, Chelsea, Dexter, Lincoln, Manchester, Milan, Saline, Whitmore Lake, Willow Run and Ypsilanti. The state government has not been able to fund our schools adequately; it’s time to take the fate of our schools back into our own hands. That’s why our school leaders have carefully and thoughtfully chosen to address this problem locally by seeking this millage—100% of which will be distributed to our local school districts.

          Why do we need to act now?

          “School funding is heading toward a crisis point…” – The Ann Arbor News editorial May 31, 2009. Most districts are facing severe shortfalls in next year’s budget—some in the millions of dollars. The Ann Arbor News editorial goes on to say that staff cuts and one-time stimulus money are part of the solution. But, more state cuts in the district's per-pupil funding—which makes up the bulk of the schools’ revenue—are projected for next school year.

          Boost for our community. This millage is a long term investment in our community. Industry and businesses are attracted to areas with strong schools and a ready, educated work force. People want to live in communities with good schools, not schools that are always in a funding crisis. Strong schools make our neighborhoods and communities nice places to live.

          What has Ypsilanti Public Schools done to reduce costs?

          Ypsilanti Public Schools has over 150 years of experience educating children and this tradition has been challenged with the recent cuts in state funding. Schools aren’t in trouble because they are overspending. YPS has cut 17 million from its budget over the past five years. The per-pupil funding from the state has decreased 9% since 1994, after inflation. We’ve lost many of the programs that have made our schools unique. Here are some of the ways we’ve already altered educational programs and facilities:
          • Eliminated drama and Spanish classes in elementary schools
          • Closed two schools
          • Sold Fletcher School to EMU
          • Reduced staffing in Music, Art and Physical Education
          • Increased class sizes
          • Restructured the middle school program, taking away coordinated teaching and teaming and an elective period
          • Eliminated one liaison officer
          • Reduced secretarial staffing at YHS
          • Reduced maintenance staffing
          • Reduced noon supervisors by 50%
          • Line item budgets were reduced significantly
          How much funding would each district receive?

          According to the School Code, the ISD shall distribute 100% of the revenue to its constituent school districts based on the number of students in each district according to the most recent audited pupil count. Using the audited September 2008 pupil count, the annual distribution of enhancement millage revenue is listed to the right.

          How much will the millage cost?

          Two mills represent a tax of varying size depending on the taxable value of a primary home. On a primary home with a taxable value of $50,000, for example, a two mill increase in property taxes is $100/year. The following chart shows the cost of the additional millage for this and other taxable values for two mills.

          Depending on your individual income tax circumstances, the additional property tax paid may be eligible as a federal income tax deduction and/or for the MI Property Tax Credit. Renters do not pay this tax at all.

          ______________________

          Voter information: All registered voters who live in the school districts of Ann Arbor, Chelsea, Dexter, Lincoln, Manchester, Milan, Saline, Whitmore Lake, Willow Run and Ypsilanti can vote on the proposal. Register to vote by October 5, 2009 – http://michigan.gov/sos.

          All the above information came from a flier that was paid for by the Friends of Education Committee P.O. Box 157, Dexter, MI 48130 Larry Cobler, Treasurer. To donate to the campaign, write your check to: Friends of Education, and mail to above address. To donate online, or to learn more visit www.washtenawfriends.org. For a yard sign, email amydoyle@ypsi.com.

          To download the flyer, click here.

          Comments on "Vote YES on Proposal I on November 3"

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (9:05 PM) : 

          Great post. Very thorough. I wish I agreed with you. I do not. Why I don't can be read at http://dcon2012.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/washtenaw-countys-blatant-attempt-at-taxation-without-representation/.

          I do have one thought I'd like to leave here for you Trusty:

          All of your arguments in FAVOR of the WISD millage were made in some form by Mayor Farmer and her friends in FAVOR of the Ypsilanti city income tax in 2007.

          Funny that, since I recall you were AGAINST that tax....

          Considering that the Ypsilanti school district has only been marginally better than Mayor Farmer's City Council at using the public's money wisely, your stance on the WISD millage seems a bit... ...inconsistent.

           

          Blogger trusty getto said ... (10:31 PM) : 

          DC: Your comment is extremely unfair and totally baseless. It is an insult to the hard workers in our district, as well as its leaders to suggest that anything the schools have done is in any way similar to the mismanagement of Water Street. You owe them an apology. To the contrary, Ypsi actually does a fantastic job with the money it receives. I defy you to objectively support your position, which I know for a fact that you can't. A few anecdotes does not an argument make. The fact is Ypsi does more with less than many districts with more.

          As for the city income tax, I was against it for a bunch of reasons. The arguments in favor of an income tax are similar to the arguments for the millage. However, the arguments against the income tax are different.

          The millage is a progressive tax that burdens landowners only. The proposed income tax was regressive, burdening the working poor and students disproportionately. I will not support a regressive tax under any circumstances.

          Moreover, the income tax would have created an adverse competitive environment. There can be no doubt that Ypsi competes with the Township. No tax scheme could possibly work that creates an incentive to locate (or relocate) a business or residence a few blocks outside the city. With a county-wide millage, that argument disappears. A countywide increased tax burden of a couple hundred dollars or so on a house worth $200K is not going to meaningfully incentivize a move to another county.

          So, it's apples and oranges from my perspective. The devil is always in the details.

          With regard to your post about taxation without representation, are you crazy? It's up for a popular vote. The arguments you set forth in your post on your blog turn democracy on its head. In a representative democracy, a popular vote such as this is far more democratic than a vote of the representatives. And the provision that created this statutory landscape is written into our constitution. Writing it in there required a popular vote of the people to enact it. It just doesn't get much more democratic than that.

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (8:13 AM) : 

          Thanks for the explanation. I see your point about the differences between this and the city income tax, and accordingly withdraw my comment on that score. :)

          I agree that a countywide tax reduces the border-crossing issue that was at the crux of SCIT. I suppose I would have less concern about new school taxes if our local and state economy were booming - but then, if they were, the schools wouldn't have a revenue shortage from existing sources.

          We're all in the same boat (individuals, businesses, public institutions) - we're all suffering the effects of Michigan's multi-year economic depression. Individuals and businesses have had to make severe and painful budget cuts, and in far too many cases have "gone under" or left the county (through foreclosure, home abandonment, etc.).

          Why is it that the teachers union and the school board be exempt from this? If we approve this millage, we are essentially requiring homeowners to take on the school employees' share of the economic pain. I don't know how things are in the legal world these days, but my income is a shadow of what it was two years ago, so this new tax would be coming out of our grocery budget. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that this is the case for many others that have managed to hang on so far.

          In essence, the proposed tax WILL reduce our competitiveness as a county because it will push more homeowners into foreclosure, and it has the potential to be a tipping point for taxpayers who are just hanging on at this point.

          I suspect that any potential gain from the tax will be more than offset by accelerating declines in overall tax revenues due to foreclosure, abandonment, and resulting declines in property value (not to mention accelerating declines in state sales and income tax revenues).

          It would be far better for our school districts to bite the bullet and live within their diminished means until property values finally begin to recover in 2013.

          As for the taxation without representation argument, I can make it very simple: Who at the WISD can I, as a voter, seek to recall for their decision to put this millage on the ballot.

          The answer is "no one," because I have no directly elected representative at that agency. The WISD is the only layer of government with taxing authority (local, county, regional, state, federal) in this state that I'm aware of where this circumstance exists.

           

          Anonymous Anonymous said ... (4:00 PM) : 

          DC you are represented by your vote.
          If our state ever intends to get ahead, we need to invest in our children and their educations. This is not a vote for the union, this is a vote to protect class sizes and programs for children. If that saves a teacher's job all the better. I have spent the last 25 years as a parent attending school meetings about how to cut the budget. I think we have very little left to cut.

          maryd

           

          Blogger trusty getto said ... (4:11 PM) : 

          DC: Maybe it's that I'm just not smart enough to follow your argument. From my perspective, "taxation without representation" was a concept that arose out of a king imposing taxes on his subjects. There was literally no representation at that time.

          In the context of this millage vote, the reason I don't follow you is that our Michigan Constitution was amended (in the 90s, I believe) to require a vote of the people to raise taxes. Consequently, the "representation" part has been written out of the law. By definition, then, there cannot be taxation without representation. The only taxation permitted under this scheme is a popular vote of the people.

          As Mary said, you represent yourself when you vote. You do not elect someone to make the decision for the group. It seems to me this was an attempt at a more pure form of democracy, not a less pure form, as your comments about "taxation without representation" would suggest.

          I also agree with Mary that years of double digit energy cost increases, insurance increases, coupled with funding increases that haven't met inflation have already cut to the bone. I'm not sure what cuts it is you favor. Making the kids wear coats in class and turning the heat off? Increasing class sizes to 40 plus and laying off teachers? You are aware that Ypsi teachers are some of the lowest paid in Washtenaw County, aren't you? As someone who is intimately familiar with our district's budget and spending history and trending, I don't think that you have any data at all to support any argument that Ypsi schools are not spending responsibly.

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (5:28 PM) : 

          Trusty,

          You're right, you don't understand the concept of "taxation without representation." These days, it's unfortunate that too few publicly-educated adults do, but that's another story. (a fact, not a personal dig or slight against you).

          We live in a republic, not a democracy. In a true democracy, the people directly rule. "Town meetings" in New England are true democratic institutions, but they are the exception here.

          In virtually all cases, we the people are "represented" in local, county, and state governments by persons elected to literally represent us and to do their best to serve the will of the people that elected them.

          That is not the case with the WISD, which has no directly elected "representatives" on its board. Since they now have, by a still recent law, the power to tax without having their leadership subject to popular vote, this is a form of taxation without representation.

          I blame this on the state legislature, which is certainly not dominated by constitutional scholars or historians, and did not think this issue through carefully enough.

          You are also incorrect about the the relationship between the English King and American colonies relating to taxes. Most of the 13 colonies DID directly elect representatives to a colonial legislature, most of which operated under some sort of constitutional-type document.

          The issue of taxation without representation arose in the American colonies after the French and Indian War, when the Parliament in London decided to impose a stamp tax on all legal documents (as well as later a tax on tea and other commodities) to try and recoup some of the expenses incurred in defending the colonies.

          Why was it taxation without representation then? Because the colonies had no direct elected representatives in Parliament, and their own locally elected colonial legislatures had only indirect and very limited influence on what Parliament did.

          It is remarkably similar here with the WISD millage. The WISD collects and distributes the "enhancement millage," but there are no directly elected local representatives on the WISD governing board.

          As a voter, I want someone on the WISD Board who desires my vote to be able to hold accountable if they are going to be collecting a tax from me.

          Whether or not we have the opportunity to vote on the tax itself is a moderating factor (the colonists didn't elect the King or the Parliament after all), but this WISD millage proposal does have the same sort of disconnected, indirect relationship between taxpayer/voter and the tax collecting agency that bedeviled the colonial Americans.

          It is as flawed a plan overall (but for different reasons) as the old Ypsilanti city income tax proposal, and like the CIT it should be rejected by a large majority in November.

           

          Blogger Amy said ... (9:40 AM) : 

          So many points to dispute, so little time. I'll just take a tiny point, and let the two of you continue the debate!

          DC, I really don't understand your complaint about the WISD and the lack of representation. Every single school board in the area voted to put this proposal on the ballot (most with unanimous support). WISD followed this directive. You vote in school board elections, don't you? There's your representation. What am I missing?

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (12:06 PM) : 

          Amy,

          Our country is based on a "representative" governmental model, where we elect people to positions of responsibility and accountability. These are our "representatives" in each level of government, and we can hold them directly responsible for how our tax money is used through:

          1. The ballot box, where we can vote them out of office;

          2. The recall process, if their behavior or actions as an elected official warrant such a drastic action; and

          3. Through our basic constitutional right to petition the government for a redress of grievances, or in other words to tell our elected representatives what we want them to do.

          The WISD is the only level of government in Michigan with authority to collect and distribute a tax that iis not overseen by directly elected representatives of those taxpayer/voters on its governing board.

          To be blunt, there is no way for a disgruntled taxpayer unhappy with how the WISD millage is being spent to seek to recall anyone on their governing board. The WISD is not directly accountable to the very people they will be collecting tax money from.

          That's taxation without representation.

          There's more on this at http://dcon2012.wordpress.com.

           

          Blogger Amy said ... (1:32 PM) : 

          DC,

          I'm not going to nitpick or argue about it.

          Have you expressed your displeasure to your elected representatives? And did you do it before, or after, they voted to endorse it?

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (2:25 PM) : 

          Last month, I drove to Lansing and testified in person to a committee of the state legislature to express my opposition to a bill the legislature is considering.

          Trusty here is well aware of my past communications with current and past Ypsilanti City Council members and a couple of Ypsi Mayors on various topics, both pro and con.

          I wrote and called several county commissioners a year or so ago when a wacky and expensive proposal to build a wood-burning furnace to heat the county jail was proposed.

          I even spoke personally with House Speaker Andy Dillon to let him know what I thought of his unwarranted attack on public charter academies in Michigan a couple of budget cycles ago.

          Oh, yes, I wrote to George W. Bush in late '08 to let him know I thought the TARP bailout bill created a dangerous precedent and would encourage the new Democrat Congressional leadership to new heights of insanity when it comes to federal government spending.

          So, the answer is yes, my elected representatives do hear from me. How about you? If not, I certainly recommend that you start. Regardless of which side of the political fence you sit on, it's important for the people you elect to know what you think, good and bad.

           

          Blogger Amy said ... (2:33 PM) : 

          DC,

          No need to get so defensive. Also, no need to give me such a lengthy list to answer a very simple question.

          Thanks for suggesting I get more involved. That's kind of funny, given my level of involvement in school issues. Yeah, I make sure my elected officials hear from me, just as I listened to the public when I was the elected official.

          I have no interest in fighting with you, so don't push so hard for it.

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (2:33 PM) : 

          Oops, I forgot to actually answer your specific question about the WISD millage, Amy:

          Who exactly do I speak with about the WISD millage? WISD says they only did it because the local districts forced them to put it on the ballot. My local school district tells me they were only "a cog in the machine" so to speak, since they were only one of 10 districts that voted on a resolution to make the request.

          That's the flaw in this process, and a serious flaw in the law that allows this WISD "enhancement millage" vote. It enables everyone involved to "pass the buck" and say they're "not really" responsible for putting this new tax burden on county residents.

          More importantly, the local school districts debated and passed their resolutions VERY QUIETLY, with virtually no public notice that I was aware of (and I keep an eye out for these things). I'm not aware of any effort on Ypsilanti's part to garner public opinion or look into whether this was a good idea at this time.

          No, I've not spoken with every single member of the Ypsilanti School Board, but I have heard from several local school officials on this topic, pro and con.

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (2:38 PM) : 

          Ahhhh.... (this is the moment when I think to myself, "Oh, you're THAT "Amy..." The one I voted for in a school board election a few years back, right?

          I apologize for sounding defensive, I'm not - just passionate about politics. I thoroughly enjoy respectful conversations with folks that disagree with me on such issues - I always learn something new.

          Perhaps that's one of the reasons I elected to move to Ypsi years ago to become a "designated conservative" in this one-party Democrat town.....

           

          Blogger trusty getto said ... (2:38 PM) : 

          DC: Who do you speak with? The voters, obviously. I'm still not getting why you want a representative to complain to when what this vote entails is far more pure.

          Those that say yea can show up and vote, as can those that say nay.

          Debate quietly? No public notice? That's total BS. Those of us that watch know exactly what is going on. Those that don't pay attention have no business complaining about that which they knew nothing about.

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (2:46 PM) : 

          Trusty,

          I watch the newspapers and online news and blogs for stuff regarding the public schools. I also have two children in the Ypsi schools at the moment, so I get school news that way too. Despite that, I didn't become aware of the resolutions requesting this WISD millage until an article appeared (in AA.com?) back in the summer sometime. It was based on a WISD press release acknowledging that they were required to put the request on the ballot.

          I'm fairly engaged politically, and I didn't know about this while the resolutions were being debated and passed. That says the schools didn't do anything other than the minimum posting of the meeting agenda on a door somewhere to let folks know this very important thing was happening.

          You know from the shenanigans of Mayor Farmer's City Council on the CIT that public officials can easily hide and obfuscate their actions when they really don't want the general public to know what's happening. It's not right, but it does happen....

           

          Blogger trusty getto said ... (2:55 PM) : 

          DC: Whoa - I'm not standing for this "one party town" nonsense. I know for a fact that people on my street are affiliated with the America First Party!

          As to the voets at meetings, you've got to get the agendas. It's the only way to know what is up. They are all posted pursuant to the Open Meetings Act. Unfortunately, none of us can rely on the press to get the word out anymore.

          Surely you are not suggesting that the school district use limited funds designated for educational services to get the word out themselves. That would subject them to criticism for failing to use funds to deliver core services ;)

           

          Blogger Amy said ... (3:01 PM) : 

          No time to chat, gotta run, but...

          I recall reading plenty of online articles this summer as the proposal was voted on, district by district. It was definitely not a secret.

          This proposal has been in the works for eons, and it has been in the news plenty--far more than previous millages I've been involved with.

          It's also been discussed at plenty of school board meetings, which I attend fairly regularly.

           

          Blogger designated conservative said ... (4:13 PM) : 

          You're right, Trusty. It's important to be clear. What I meant when I wrote that Ypsi is a one-party Democrat town, I meant that unless you have the big "(D)" after you're name (and have been verified by the Democrat old-timers to be a "real" Democrat, you cannot get elected in this town.

          ...although, 2010 is shaping up to be a good year for Michigan candidates to not be a Democrat.... :)

           

          Anonymous Anonymous said ... (8:44 PM) : 

          Yes DC, and it is sadly so. But certainly not in the best interest of the state.

          maryd

           

          post a comment
          links to this post